Re: On "reject" and :fcc

--On 17. Januar 2017 um 16:24:12 -0800 [email protected] 
wrote:

>> Sometimes you want to keep the junk that was sent to you while saying to
>> the sender that nobody got that message.  Making that hard within the
>> standard will just cause people to work around it by doing things like
>> capturing all mail that hits the MXes before sieve processes it.  Not
>> providing a facility because it can be used to lie doesn't change that.
>
> As I said before, if you really think it's perfectly OK to provide a
> mechanism to your users that allows them to instruct the system to lie in
> an offical system message about them not having gotten the content of a
> mail message, then we have nothing further to talk about.

For the record, I agree with Bron on this. It's up to the users if they 
want to lie.
-- 
    .:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
                 .:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
   .:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.

_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve