Re: On "reject" and :fcc
Ken Murchison <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mta-filters |
|---|---|
| Organization | Carnegie Mellon University |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
As it turns out, the point with soon be moot w.r.t. Cyrus. I realized last night that I never implemented ereject, and when I do, Cyrus will reject at the LMTP level and therefore no DSN or MDN. On 01/18/2017 04:06 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > > --On 17. Januar 2017 um 16:24:12 -0800 > [email protected] wrote: > >>> Sometimes you want to keep the junk that was sent to you while >>> saying to >>> the sender that nobody got that message. Making that hard within the >>> standard will just cause people to work around it by doing things like >>> capturing all mail that hits the MXes before sieve processes it. Not >>> providing a facility because it can be used to lie doesn't change that. >> >> As I said before, if you really think it's perfectly OK to provide a >> mechanism to your users that allows them to instruct the system to >> lie in >> an offical system message about them not having gotten the content of a >> mail message, then we have nothing further to talk about. > > For the record, I agree with Bron on this. It's up to the users if > they want to lie. -- Kenneth Murchison Principal Systems Software Engineer Carnegie Mellon University _______________________________________________ sieve mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve