Re: FTC stuff 0) Lies 1)Yahoo & DK. 2)GoDaddy DNS & SPF & CSV. 3)Dean & FUSSP. 4)Testing 5)EFF, Anonymity.
John Levine <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Organization | I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>0)Some lies and misleading statements from Microsoft's Harry Katz (& Ryan): The Microsoft people came to make political statements, not technical ones. It was dismayingly clear that Harry et al have decided that Sender ID's technical failures don't matter. I wouldn't call it lying, perhaps corporately enhanced myopia. >1)Did the Yahoo folks at the FTC conference say that they would be >signing all outbound mail by now, and would be checking incoming mail soon? I just checked and they're signing my free Yahoo mail. >Is the replay problem solved? Until it is, I see no point in deploying >DK or IMM, since they won't work long term. What replay problem? The fact that a recipient MTA can forward a message and not break the signature is a feature, not a bug. If you want to avoid accepting old stale mail, you can always check the header date which DK and IIM should be signing. The point of DK or IIM is to say that the putative author really is the author of a message, and if a recipient remails it, that doesn't change. It does put the onus on message authors to avoid sending mail to recipients who will misuse it, but that's nothing new. The alternative is to take a big gulp of SPF kool-aid and decide that mail forwarding has, after 20 years, stopped being part of the way that SMTP mail works. I hope we don't want to go there. If we want SPF, we all know where to find it. >5)EFF, Anonymity. At last year's FTC spam forum Cindy Cohn, who is otherwise a very smart person, didn't have a clue about e-mail, and it was clear last week that the EFF hasn't learned anything in the meantime. It was pretty telling that Annalee said she sorts through 2000 spams a day by hand and apparently thinks that's a useful way to spend her time. >The folks from the FTC running the conference. They get it. I was >pleasantly surprised. Yes indeed. Too bad the Congress hasn't given them better tools to work with. -- John R. Levine, IECC, POB 727, Trumansburg NY 14886 +1 607 330 5711 [email protected], Mayor, http://johnlevine.com, Member, Provisional board, Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail