Re: So here it is one year later...
Andrew Newton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jan 28, 2005, at 2:20 PM, wayne wrote: > The problem is not that draft-schlitt-spf-00 > changed things back, but that the IETF, via the MARID WG, allowed it > to change in the first place. This statement strikes me as particularly offensive. If the intent was to have the IETF simply rubber-stamp SPF, making that clear up front would have saved us all a lot of time. -andy