Re: So here it is one year later...

Andrew Newton wrote:

> If the intent was to have the IETF simply rubber-stamp SPF,
> making that clear up front would have saved us all a lot of
> time.

My intention was always to get a RfC for LMAP (with SPF as the
most promising candidate at this time, but also including CSV),
i.e. to find and fix all bugs and oddities in these concepts.

You never allowed this to happen here.  You always pressed for
2822 and the IMHO broken Sender-ID concept, and when that failed
you let the A-D close this WG without prior consultation.
-- 
<http://purl.net/xyzzy/home/test/MARID.appeal.txt>