Re: So here it is one year later...

On Jan 29, 2005, at 12:32 AM, wayne wrote:
> For
> some strange reason, the IETF is now considering the SenderID drafts
> that still use the same records.  Go figure.

If by same records, you mean anything TXT then I'm afraid you will have 
to live with that... and any other new uses for TXT that come along.

> So, not rubber-stamping SPF wasn't a problem.  Creating a new spec
> that changed the semantics of SPF records was.

But I suppose you mean the v=spf1 records and agree that you have a 
point.... which is not what I thought you were saying.  Sorry for 
jumping to conclusions.

-andy