Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"
wayne <[email protected]> Thu, 26 May 2005 12:18:12 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <[email protected]> Richard Clayton <[email protected]> writes: > Hence, since they still want to spam, they will start sending email with > borrowed domains from borrowed machines... they are already doing the > latter, they don't do the former because there's currently no need. SPF > would, if adopted, provide the evolutionary pressure for them to do so. > > Of course you may feel that if [email protected] is so dumb as to install > a spam-sending trojan that it serves him right if example.com gets a > really bad reputation. However, if I have a need to swap email with > example.com employees how exactly has SPF improved the situation here ? example.com can quickly update their SPF record to remove the offending IP address from their approved list. -wayne