RE: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/")
Mark <[email protected]> Thu, 26 May 2005 18:56:23 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Organization | Asarian-host |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Levine > Sent: donderdag 26 mei 2005 19:12 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF > concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at > http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/") > > > > The domain names in my EHLOs is completely disjoint from the set in my > MAIL FROM and mail headers. How is SPF going to handle that? Typically, HELO/EHLO is only used in the special case of MAIL FROM: <>, so to have the SPF client check against postmaster@HELO. Since there is no MAIL FROM identity to protect in case of an empty envelope-from, it would suffice to just publish this simple SPF record (BIND style) for your completely disjoint HELO/EHLO name: completelydisjoint.mydomain.com. TXT "v=spf1 a -all" That will ensure, that in the case of a DSN, your own mailer is always authorized (and no one else!). That easy. - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx