Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"
Richard Clayton <[email protected]> Thu, 26 May 2005 19:53:32 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mxcomp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <[email protected]>, wayne <[email protected]> writes > >In <[email protected]> Richard Clayton <[email protected]> >writes: > >> Hence, since they still want to spam, they will start sending email with >> borrowed domains from borrowed machines... they are already doing the >> latter, they don't do the former because there's currently no need. SPF >> would, if adopted, provide the evolutionary pressure for them to do so. >> >> Of course you may feel that if [email protected] is so dumb as to install >> a spam-sending trojan that it serves him right if example.com gets a >> really bad reputation. However, if I have a need to swap email with >> example.com employees how exactly has SPF improved the situation here ? > >example.com can quickly update their SPF record to remove the >offending IP address from their approved list. fair enough -- but this is reactive and the reputation service will have been complained to at the same time, possibly well before, example.com learnt of the problem. The reputation of example.com (which apparently SPF is going to allow me to judge) will still suffer. or are you expecting the reputation not to be for example.com but for each individual part of it... if so then I'm still unclear what SPF is bringing to the party here. now consider where example.com is a large company (or an ISP) running a small number of mail servers then (a) the action is NOT going to be to change the SPF record but to revoke an authorisation and (b) it's even more opaque as to how the reputation service can reflect that this has been done or quite what SPF has contributed once again, I don't mind SPF being promoted for what it will do, but when it is argued that other things will flow from that then the justification really doesn't seem to stand up. I repeat my advice from another place to give up proselytising how SPF will make a better world and just concentrate on a comprehensible, interworkable standard that doesn't break anything else. If it then turns out to have magical powers and cures cancer and stuff then that's peachy. But its unnecessary to promote that up front. - -- richard richard.clayton @ h i g h w a y m a n . com "Assembly of Japanese bicycle require great peace of mind" quoted in ZAMM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBQpYbLJoAxkTY1oPiEQJ2xQCgoA/MSyIgMRnBKeVsyscCJuFW4vgAn0ag WmLALimrRXuZvrDwyiqLmP8i =C5i1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----