draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane
"Voyer, Daniel" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AC5554B3-C582-40FD-808D-CB5253BDC009__20078.9546398029$1507907434$gmane$org@bell.ca> |
Hi, This is very good proposal. On Section 4. Mobile user plane The core network doesn’t require to be SRv6 – it could be IPv6 only. This demonstrate SRv6 flexibility. On Section 5.2. Layer-2 Anchor segment Can you add more explanation to “In downlink, there's no difference between the uplink behavior.” On section 7. Control plane considerations The centralized controller should be marked as out-of-scope of this document. Thx dan _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm