Re: draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane
"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D6063584.290811%[email protected]> |
Thanks Daniel for your reviews. Folks - Please review and provide your feedback on this document. Sri From: dmm <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Voyer, Daniel" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, October 13, 2017 at 8:09 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [DMM] draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane Hi, This is very good proposal. On Section 4. Mobile user plane The core network doesn't require to be SRv6 - it could be IPv6 only. This demonstrate SRv6 flexibility. On Section 5.2. Layer-2 Anchor segment Can you add more explanation to "In downlink, there's no difference between the uplink behavior." On section 7. Control plane considerations The centralized controller should be marked as out-of-scope of this document. Thx dan _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm