Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: (with COMMENT)
Erik Kline <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMGpriUp6X9uEbMfGqef1OzbHSfzQN66EfPOGNjOix4-Xm=THw@mail.gmail.com> |
> > ** I also don’t understand the 3GPP coordination described in the shepherd > report resulting in this document being moved from PS to Informational > status. > Is this new behavior requested by 3GPP? > Roman, I tried to give a heads up <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iesg/LNZKzM6nRDJOuXu6iRksJ7ExMms/> earlier, and also mention it at [a bit] more length in the ballot write up <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane/writeup/>: the change to Informational track was requested by 3GPP liaison (and others). _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm