Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The shepherd writeup avoids the question about current or planned
implementations, and the simple answer "Yes" to #17 seems to be not as
informative as we'd like.

Section 11 is missing the "Change controller" column for all values.  I can't
tell why that column is present in the registry, actually, since it wasn't
present in RFC 8986 which created it, so it seems like there's something to be
cleaned up here with IANA.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.