Re: [MEXT] IETF-80 meeting minutes posted / clarifications on draft-liu-mext-distributed-mobile-ip
Romain KUNTZ <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Pierrick, Allow to jump into the discussion, I have a couple of questions regarding this draft. On Apr 20, 2011, at 1:14, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > IMHO, the "multiple home addresses" feature was misunderstood during the meeting. It is not require that a MN attached to a HA uses severals HoAs. Actually, the MN can use several home addresses only when attached to several HAs. Considering the use-case above, it means: > - Flow#1 served by HA1/AR1 and uses HoA1 > - flow#2 served by HA2/AR2 and uses HoA2 Still, how does a CN that wishes to contact a MN selects the correct Home Address? The MN would need to be always anchored to one HA in order to keep at least one stable HoA over time. Also, how would you prevent a malicious node to register 2 symmetric bindings at 2 different home agents (say HoA1<->HoA2 at HA1, and HoA2<->HoA1 at HA2), which could potentially lead to a routing loop between both HAs? Regards, Romain