Re: [MEXT] IETF-80 meeting minutes posted / clarifications on draft-liu-mext-distributed-mobile-ip

On 4/20/11 10:14 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> IMHO, the "multiple home addresses" feature was misunderstood during
> the meeting. It is not require that a MN attached to a HA uses
> severals HoAs. Actually, the MN can use several home addresses only
> when attached to several HAs. Considering the use-case above, it
> means: - Flow#1 served by HA1/AR1 and uses HoA1 - flow#2 served by
> HA2/AR2 and uses HoA2

Hi,

 From my point of view and how we are deploying mobility here it is 
desirable (or for our case mandatory) for MN to use only one stable HoA 
at all times, not many of them. At the same time it would be very nice 
to have multiple HAs, so you could connect to nearest one and optimize 
the path.

My thought was to anycast HA address where MN connects and deal with HoA 
advertising on network side with dynamic routing protocols.

Still need to think about that.

Cheers, Jan