Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81

Dirk and Hidetoshi,

Face to face meeting time should IMHO primarily be used to resolve
issues that cannot be resolved on the WG mailing list. As of now I do
not see any, hence the absence of a MEXT WG meeting.

Best,

--julien

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:09 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all,
> I agree with Hidetoshi that the flow binding initiation draft should need more discussion - as well as DMM progress in the framework of MEXT and potentially the vehicular topics recently mentioned by Alex on this list.
> Wouldn't that qualify to include a WG session meeting in http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/?
>
> Best regards
> Dirk
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Hidetoshi Yokota
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:12
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81
>
> Hi Julien and all,
>
> Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of
> "Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to
> discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got
> consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting
> will be needed.
>
> Please take a look at the following I-D:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt
>
> Thanks in advance for your support,
> --
> Hidetoshi
>
> (2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require
>> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec.
>>
>> --julien&  marcelo
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>