[MEXT] draft-kuntz-dmm-summary-00

Hi Romain,
  A quick review of your draft.
On HMIPv6, I agree with your observations.
I think that DMA and DLMA are PMIPv6 dmm solutions and so maybe not so 
interesting for Mext.
ON DMI,it is a little archaic and also does not address all issues of DMM. It 
just gives some good ideas, I think.

You mentioned separation of control and data planes which is from 
yokota-dmm-scenario. This is a tough requirement to satisfy within MIPv6 domain. 
I think that one more requirement of no extensions to MIPv6 has been mentioned 
in Beijing meeting. So the drafts can be measured on how close they come to this 
requirement.

Lastly, you have not covered newer drafts like draft-sarikaya-mext-multicastdmm.

It would be more productive to review the dmm solution drafts on mext list, as 
Julien mentioned.
 
Regards,

Behcet