Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81

Hi Julien,

WG mailing list is the base of the discussion, but sometimes it takes 
very long time to proceed, by which it loses timeliness. 
Network-initiated flow mobility or Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) 
come from urgent needs and IETF has the reputation of responding to such 
needs in a timely manner. F2F meeting is generally more efficient than 
ML discussion and effective for the chairs to progress the standards 
process. I believe that ML discussion and F2F meeting are the two wheels 
of moving I-Ds forward and we shouldn't miss the opportunity of F2F 
meetings, which happen only three times in a year.

Regards,
-- 
Hidetoshi

(2011/07/06 0:29), Julien Laganier wrote:
> Dirk and Hidetoshi,
>
> Face to face meeting time should IMHO primarily be used to resolve
> issues that cannot be resolved on the WG mailing list. As of now I do
> not see any, hence the absence of a MEXT WG meeting.
>
> Best,
>
> --julien
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:09 AM,<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I agree with Hidetoshi that the flow binding initiation draft should need more discussion - as well as DMM progress in the framework of MEXT and potentially the vehicular topics recently mentioned by Alex on this list.
>> Wouldn't that qualify to include a WG session meeting in http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Dirk
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Hidetoshi Yokota
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:12
>> An: [email protected]
>> Betreff: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81
>>
>> Hi Julien and all,
>>
>> Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of
>> "Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to
>> discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got
>> consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting
>> will be needed.
>>
>> Please take a look at the following I-D:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your support,
>> --
>> Hidetoshi
>>
>> (2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require
>>> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec.
>>>
>>> --julien&    marcelo
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MEXT mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext