Re: Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap analysis" document

Hidetoshi Yokota <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,

Sorry for my last minute comment. In comparing the two documents, [1]
gives a detailed analysis of 3GPP technologies, but may be too much
focused on one SDO. [2] analyzes WiFi networks as well as 3GPP, which
provides somewhat a good balance for an IETF document by mentioning
multiple access technologies. If I have to pick only one, [2]
"draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01" is good for the base
document.

Regards,
-- 
Hidetoshi

(2012/12/20 5:25), Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies for that. The next step is to select a "current practices and gap analysis" document to serve as the basis for the future WG document. We consider two documents on this topic to choose from:
> 
> [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02
> [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
> 
> and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the _basis_ for the WG document.
> 
> Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the mailing list. We would appreciate if you can also provide a one-liner justification for your selection. The chairs will determine if there is (rough) consensus from active WG participants to proceed with selecting one document against the other.
> 
> The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We have a longer three week call now due the holiday season in between.
> 
> - Jouni & Julien
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.