Re: Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap analysis" document
Alexandru Petrescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I support [2] draft-liu as basis for WG item, because it first abstracts the common functions of mobility protocols. And, a combination of the two could only be better, right? Alex Le 19/12/2012 21:25, Jouni Korhonen a écrit : > Folks, > > We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies > for that. The next step is to select a "current practices and gap > analysis" document to serve as the basis for the future WG document. > We consider two documents on this topic to choose from: > > [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 [2] > draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 > > and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the _basis_ > for the WG document. > > Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the > mailing list. We would appreciate if you can also provide a > one-liner justification for your selection. The chairs will determine > if there is (rough) consensus from active WG participants to proceed > with selecting one document against the other. > > The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We > have a longer three week call now due the holiday season in between. > > - Jouni & Julien _______________________________________________ dmm > mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > >