Re: Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap analysis" document

Alexandru Petrescu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I support [2] draft-liu as basis for WG item, because it first abstracts
the common functions of mobility protocols.

And, a combination of the two could only be better, right?

Alex

Le 19/12/2012 21:25, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
> Folks,
>
> We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies
> for that. The next step is to select a "current practices and gap
> analysis" document to serve as the basis for the future WG document.
> We consider two documents on this topic to choose from:
>
> [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 [2]
> draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
>
> and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the _basis_
> for the WG document.
>
> Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the
> mailing list. We would appreciate if you can also provide a
> one-liner justification for your selection. The chairs will determine
> if there is (rough) consensus from active WG participants to proceed
> with selecting one document against the other.
>
> The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We
> have a longer three week call now due the holiday season in between.
>
> - Jouni & Julien _______________________________________________ dmm
> mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.