Re: WGLC starts for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03

Brian Haberman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On 4/9/13 6:10 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>
> I believe multicast is a distraction to dmm at this moment.
>

I am curious as to why you call it a distraction.  It seems to me that 
having multicast support considered at the beginning of the process is 
much better than trying to bolt it on after the fact.  That is the 
reason that I suggested that DMM-related multicast be discussed in DMM.

Could you explain why multicast should not be considered by DMM?

Regards,
Brian
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.