Re: WGLC starts for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03
Stig Venaas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/10/2013 8:02 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: > On 4/9/13 6:10 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: >> >> I believe multicast is a distraction to dmm at this moment. >> > > I am curious as to why you call it a distraction. It seems to me that > having multicast support considered at the beginning of the process is > much better than trying to bolt it on after the fact. That is the > reason that I suggested that DMM-related multicast be discussed in DMM. This is why I (and I believe a few other people) wanted this in the requirements document. Is your objection that multicast is mentioned at all, or the wording of the section? Stig > Could you explain why multicast should not be considered by DMM? > > Regards, > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm