Re: IETF#90 DMM agenda update

Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <CAC8QAcfc_c+5SX-HGLJik91J2ykzZf4J71UzKc14wu_4g7qyyw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Brian Haberman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/23/14 10:16 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>> So my question is what guarantees that is the DT is going to produce
>> the right solution and why repeat the history again?
>>
>
> Who said that *if* a DT is formed that its output is considered special?
>
> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/design-team.html
>

My point is that at this time in dmm I can not see any justification
for forming a design team to develop a solution or parts of a
solution.
We already have solutions and it seems like at least one of them is
implemented. I don't think it is reasonable to expect any deployment
now.
In view of this I am unable to see the need for some many items in the
proposed charter.

Regards,

Behcet
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.