Re: IETF#90 DMM agenda update
Brian Haberman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/23/14 10:49 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Brian Haberman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On 7/23/14 10:16 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: >>> So my question is what guarantees that is the DT is going to produce >>> the right solution and why repeat the history again? >>> >> >> Who said that *if* a DT is formed that its output is considered special? >> >> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/design-team.html >> > > My point is that at this time in dmm I can not see any justification > for forming a design team to develop a solution or parts of a > solution. Jouni pointed out that the DT approach is just an option. > We already have solutions and it seems like at least one of them is > implemented. I don't think it is reasonable to expect any deployment > now. > In view of this I am unable to see the need for some many items in the > proposed charter. > > Regards, > > Behcet >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 536 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTz8y/AAoJEBOZRqCi7goqefwH/2Y4igog2qe4G8hpyB0RaFCs E48OgCjpC9atTX0LxhsRcwHwnO3cUGu7Ms5jn+kCChxi3IQuqligHFpuz+JoQc1d xKZuQQ+iesDswL17XSSMsQddb/lDWs6CUakz+KLOp0DiA4L1VrKg+95W73ybbAqW G47B5AYGnU+mOHT6VErDap1hDJHclyz/TV9Tq1gAn9NdH5jqMvfimQ7xjB2OTein uvDKD+XEt1LkIOcexWheenCCV+rab7ns9mr7/mwz/uJylURJGiONdN2iIeUSH/Ii PlDiURurOkMxgcDuuutVW8VrByyuE9YPu5YOnSpdC/UStIxEwNlXUaXlZVvKsQw= =h1HD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----