Re: regarding the re-chartering..

Brian Haberman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 7/24/14 6:01 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Hi Jouni,
> 
> Regarding
> 
> Distributed mobility management deployment models and scenarios:
> 
> As I said in the session today I am having trouble understanding the
> deployment models.
> 
> To me it sounds like doing the last thing first, i.e. after we get the
> dmm solution we work on how to deploy it (of course if the deployment
> has not already been considered by the solution).

I may be interpreting the charter incorrectly, but I think there may be
a disconnect.  I interpreted the the charter text as describing
deployment models like:

- Wi-Fi-based mobility management

- Cellular (e.g., 3GPP) mobility management

- Mixed technology mobility management

- etc.

If that above interpretation is what was intended, I think it makes
sense to have that type of description available to guide solution
development.

If the above is not correct, then I suspect the charter needs some
clarification.

Regards,
Brian

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 536 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJT0YYOAAoJEBOZRqCi7goq7OMH/236HD/6iB1NLBRB8h4FG5Uo
hh7+SzO8JbzEBIv0+Efc/yJYJ5rlMpJCZTZpA9XhnpEj5HXAEHhUKsXV+nvS9mQi
H7vCAfGCbJ67ry7kQw5TkA57QdyjYtPdJoRA1UlmuS2gwV7XxD9raO7PO9JV5Ux5
NDuAX8lomoMA/FRfO3EF6dzKZoXOrIcFQULZ5mtT7q4retf9PvWaqqciBiiFgP/U
p0K/sv2S49tgAQIv5f+uZYUUNZNDVJg2SnUev7KpE9g4rlwl8FC8dkhFirfE5b0W
edLvDYtgMikoPoxYfsWC0VrwstmSPKD7ivhT8xWjcsAcQ82HqTnMDc0IGUtkC/c=
=0Ik0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.