Re: regarding the re-chartering..

Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>

7/25/2014 1:17 AM, Brian Haberman kirjoitti:
>
>
> On 7/24/14 6:01 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>> Hi Jouni,
>>
>> Regarding
>>
>> Distributed mobility management deployment models and scenarios:
>>
>> As I said in the session today I am having trouble understanding the
>> deployment models.
>>
>> To me it sounds like doing the last thing first, i.e. after we get the
>> dmm solution we work on how to deploy it (of course if the deployment
>> has not already been considered by the solution).
>
> I may be interpreting the charter incorrectly, but I think there may be
> a disconnect.  I interpreted the the charter text as describing
> deployment models like:
>
> - Wi-Fi-based mobility management
>
> - Cellular (e.g., 3GPP) mobility management
>
> - Mixed technology mobility management
>
> - etc.
>
> If that above interpretation is what was intended, I think it makes
> sense to have that type of description available to guide solution
> development.

The above interpretation is correct.

- Jouni


>
> If the above is not correct, then I suspect the charter needs some
> clarification.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.