Re: question on 'draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility'

Alexandru Petrescu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <5536A8E8.5000705__6259.95173254541$1429645572$gmane$org@gmail.com>
Le 03/04/2015 20:12, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
> Hi Danny and Alper,
>
> In this draft, you seem to be considering only DHCPv6 address delegation for
> when the node is acting as a mobile host. I am wondering if there are similar
> considerations for DHCPv6 prefix delegation for when the node is acting as
> a mobile router.
>
> But then, I wonder whether any type of prefix delegation other than a
> fixed prefix makes any sense. For example, if the mobile router received
> a nomadic prefix delegation, would it need to renumber its connected
> networks every time it moves and receives a new nomadic prefix?
>
> Should this document discuss prefix delegation considerations for mobile
> routers, or only address delegation for mobile hosts?
>
> Thanks - Fred
> [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
>

I second this question.

I have already tried to raise this issue to authors and believe they 
have an oppinion on it.

Alex
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.