Re: question on 'draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility'
Alexandru Petrescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5536A8E8.5000705__6259.95173254541$1429645572$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Le 03/04/2015 20:12, Templin, Fred L a écrit : > Hi Danny and Alper, > > In this draft, you seem to be considering only DHCPv6 address delegation for > when the node is acting as a mobile host. I am wondering if there are similar > considerations for DHCPv6 prefix delegation for when the node is acting as > a mobile router. > > But then, I wonder whether any type of prefix delegation other than a > fixed prefix makes any sense. For example, if the mobile router received > a nomadic prefix delegation, would it need to renumber its connected > networks every time it moves and receives a new nomadic prefix? > > Should this document discuss prefix delegation considerations for mobile > routers, or only address delegation for mobile hosts? > > Thanks - Fred > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > I second this question. I have already tried to raise this issue to authors and believe they have an oppinion on it. Alex