Re: Call for adoption: draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01

Le 16/04/2015 06:58, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
> Folks,
>
> The adoption call for this I-D has ended. There is a clear concensus to
> adopt the I-D as a working group item.

I support its adoption.

We have been working with an identifier specific to automobiles to use 
to realize access control.  Identifying an entire set of IP nodes 
deployed in a vehicle is different than identifying an end-user like 
address@realm.

We looked for such an identifier and believe the VIN (Vehicle 
Identification Number) be a good candidate.

One would consider using one type, like type 40, to encode the VIN or 
parts of it, into an MN-ID.

The questions to the group are the following:
- is VIN considered private information? (in deployments it is private
   to a certain extent, but publicly avaliable to cameras or in public
   databases to another extent).
- is the MN-ID type 40 ok for it.
- is one type sufficient or should there be subtypes.

Yours,

Alex

>
> - Jouni & Dapeng
>
> 4/1/2015, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
>> Folks,
>>
>> This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
>>    draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
>> to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
>> EOB PST.
>>
>> Express your support or opposition to the mailing list. During the
>> IETF92 meeting we got 7 voices for the adoption so at least the same
>> amount supporting emails should be expected.
>>
>> - Jouni & Dapeng
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
>