RES: ReN: IPv6 tranisition issues
"Marcelo Barbosa Lima" <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jan 2003 09:26:21 -0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ngtrans |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D49EA2F934FFAD45B337C07A9753C00E017E9F9E@MAILSRV1.aquarius.cpqd.com.br> |
FOlks, Look, please, in this URL. It seems that Microsoft wants to impulsionat= e Ipv6 development too :-). http://news.com.com/2100-1033-885664.html Best Regards, Marcelo -----Mensagem original----- De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Enviada em: s=E1bado, 28 de dezembro de 2002 07:04 Para: Keith Moore Cc: [email protected] Assunto: Re: ReN: (ngtrans) IPv6 tranisition issues Keith, Thank you for your input. I have looked at various angles on this but end up at a dead-end every time. As in my earlier postings looking at IPv6 and the many obvious advatages in QoS, multicast, routing, address space, mobility, etc, there is always an IPv4 solution for this. The solution may be a dodgy patch, not as streamlined or designed from the ground up as the IPv6 version, but it works and John Q. Public is not going to rush out now or even look at including an IPv6 subnet in his current IPv4 setup. The key word here is 'now'. Perhaps later or of course when 3G networks are available, but when?. A good example is to look at the Y2K issue. Most companies started addressing the issue at the last minute only. And this could possibly be the path with the IP address shortage issue. So what compelling enough reason can be presented to Mr. John here for him to even consider IPv6. Even start looking at a staggered transition plan. Or even hardware/software developers -most of these are either from Europe and Japan. Regards, -nick/