Re: RES: IPv6 tranisition issues
Pekka Savola <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:10:02 +0200 (EET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ngtrans |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Marcelo Barbosa Lima wrote: > >Yes, in a typing fury I forgot/missed the IPv6 solution for mobility. > >IPv6 is streamlined and designed for mobility in mind. Again there are > >the patches in IPv4, although riddled with triangular routing issues. > >But then again is there anyone really into mobile IP? And I use NTT > >DoCoMo and likes in Japan as examples for this and not a 'hotspot' cafe > >answer on 802.11. > > > > In IPv4, attacks against ARP protocol (mobile IPv4 trusts in ARP > protocol) are easy to implment. DHCP can also be bypassed easily. So, > neighbour protocol with AH is more secure solution. Regards, Less market speak, more technology, please. Securing the neighbor protocol with AH is _hard_. Please check out SEND working group. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords