Re: GIST Q/D-mode issue

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Georgios Karagiannis wrote:

 Hi Georgios,

> Hi Lauri
> 
> Yes I mean the Loal Processing hints.

 Ok.

> Regarding the NSLP API, if the Q-flag is used then I propose to change the
> NSLP API.

 Adding the Q-flag does not inflict any changes to the NSLP API. Thus, no 
changes have been proposed. As far as I know, adding the Q-flag does not 
change GIST functionality for NSLP developers at all. It just allows GIST 
to work correctly.

> Best regards,
> Georgios

 Best regards,
 Lauri

> 
> 
> On 9/25/2008, "Lauri J T Liuhto" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Georgios Karagiannis wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >> In the current specification of GIST it is mentioned that the NSLP can
> >> request from GIST to use Q-mode.
> >
> > Do you mean Local Processing hints (see ntlp I.D v16, page 24) or
> >something else?
> >
> >> When using the Q-flag, I assume that NSLP can then require from GIST to
> >> set/unset the Q-flag.
> >
> > Q-flag changes only GIST layer - as far as I know, changes to NSLP API
> >have not been proposed.
> >
> >> If the above is right then I am in favour of using the Q-flag!
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Georgios
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Lauri
> >
> >--
> >Lauri Liuhto
> 

-- 
Lauri Liuhto
[email protected] -- 040-7009603