Re: GIST Q/D-mode issue
"Georgios Karagiannis" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nsis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Lauri Yes, I know that it has not been proposed. I am now proposing to include this modification into the NSLP API. Best regards, Georgios On 9/25/2008, "Lauri J T Liuhto" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Georgios Karagiannis wrote: > > Hi Georgios, > >> Hi Lauri >> >> Yes I mean the Loal Processing hints. > > Ok. > >> Regarding the NSLP API, if the Q-flag is used then I propose to change the >> NSLP API. > > Adding the Q-flag does not inflict any changes to the NSLP API. Thus, no >changes have been proposed. As far as I know, adding the Q-flag does not >change GIST functionality for NSLP developers at all. It just allows GIST >to work correctly. > >> Best regards, >> Georgios > > Best regards, > Lauri > >> >> >> On 9/25/2008, "Lauri J T Liuhto" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Georgios Karagiannis wrote: >> >> Hi all >> >> In the current specification of GIST it is mentioned that the NSLP can >> >> request from GIST to use Q-mode. >> > >> > Do you mean Local Processing hints (see ntlp I.D v16, page 24) or >> >something else? >> > >> >> When using the Q-flag, I assume that NSLP can then require from GIST to >> >> set/unset the Q-flag. >> > >> > Q-flag changes only GIST layer - as far as I know, changes to NSLP API >> >have not been proposed. >> > >> >> If the above is right then I am in favour of using the Q-flag! >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Georgios >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Lauri >> > >> >-- >> >Lauri Liuhto >> > >-- >Lauri Liuhto >[email protected] -- 040-7009603