Re: GIST: Change of IANA Considerations: Action Type for code point allocation
Elwyn Davies <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:10:37 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nsis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martin Stiemerling wrote: > Dear all, > > Magnus hinted me to the fact that the IANA considerations of GIST (draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-20) require "Standards Action" to allocate a new code point. For instance for the GIST Message Type: > Allocation policies for further values are as follows: > 6-31: Standards Action > > This was appropriate as long as GIST had the intended status "Standards Track". But now it is "Experimental" and the requirement to have "Standards Action" to allocate a new code point isn't appropriate anymore for this document track. > > **Call for WG consensus**: > Is anybody objecting that the IANA actions in draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-20 currently requiring "Standards Action" are changed to "Expert Review"? > > Let the WG and me know your objections or agreement to this by January 29th 5pm CET. > > Thank you, > > Martin > > > [email protected] > > NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division > NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 > > _______________________________________________ > nsis mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis > And this implies changes to the extensions draft, per Magnus' AD review comments. Boring. /Elwyn