Re: AD evaluation comments on draft-ietf-nsis-rmd-15
"Georgios Karagiannis" <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:24:38 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nsis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jerry Please see in line! On 2/26/2010, "Gerald Ash" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Georgios, > >>>1. Section 4.1.1 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nsis-rmd-15#section-4.1.1) defines >>> a <bandwidth> parameter, which appears is intended to replace the mandatory TMOD >>> parameter for use in the RMD-QOSM. The QSPEC specifies in Section 3.1.1. >>>(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-24#section-3.3.1) >>>" The <Traffic Model> (TMOD) parameter is mandatory for the QNI to >>> include in the initiator QSPEC and mandatory for downstream QNEs to >>> interpret. " >>>and >>>" All 5 of the sub-parameters MUST be included in the TMOD parameter. >>> The TMOD parameter can be set to describe the traffic source. If, >>> for example, TMOD is set to specify bandwidth only, then set r = peak >>> rate = p, b = large, m = large. " >>> >>> Hence the RMD-QOSM MUST use the TMOD parameter and can use it to >>> specify "bandwidth" only, as per the second statement above (recall that the second >>> statement was specifically included with RMD-QOSM in mind). The <bandwidth> >>> parameter is therefore unnecessary in RMD-QOSM. > >> Georgios: Thanks! You are right, but we still need that IANA assigns the >> <Bandwidth> parameter. In order to satisfy your comment, we will >> redefine the <Bandwidth> parameter in the following way: > >> The bit format used for the <Bandwidth> parameter is identical to the >> bit format of the <TMOD-1> parameter format specified in [QSP-T] but the >> fields are set in the following way: >> o TMOD Rate-1 (r)= Peak Data Rate-1 (p) >> o TMOD Size-1 (b) = large >> o Minimum Policed Unit-1 (m) = large > >It wouldn't be appropriate to have IANA specify the values of the sub-parameters of TMOD-1. I suggest that you define these TMOD-1 sub-parameter values in Section 4.1.1, and remove references to a new "<bandwidth>" parameter. You might also want to specify a specific value for "large". Georgios: I do not think that IANA will specify the values TMOD-1 sub-parameter values. --------------- The bandwidth parameter is just the translation of the T-MOD parameter to the bandwidth paramter. I will include the following information in the draft: The bit format used for the <Bandwidth> parameter is shown below and it is a translation of the <TMOD-1> parameter, see [QSP-T], to specify bandwidth only, by setting, see [QSP-T]: o TMOD Rate-1 (r)= Peak Data Rate-1 (p) o TMOD Size-1 (b) = large o Minimum Policed Unit-1 (m) = large 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1|E|0|r| Bandwidth ID |r|r|r|r| 5 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Peak Data Rate-1 (p) (32-bit IEEE floating point number) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | TMOD Size-1 (b) (32-bit IEEE floating point number) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Peak Data Rate-1 (p) (32-bit IEEE floating point number) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Minimum Policed Unit-1 (m) (32-bit unsigned integer) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Maximum Packet Size-1 (MPS) (32-bit unsigned integer) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ------------------------------------------ Regarding the "large" values, I will specify them in Section 4.6. Best regards, Georgios > >Thanks, >Jerry > > > > > > )