Re: NSLP Registry Question
"Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:48:19 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nsis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4502BA4FA9@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> |
Thanks Martin for the super quick response. In that case I would suggest to add the NSLP name to the different error code registries, such as s/"Informational Error Codes"/"QoS NSLP Informational Error Codes", etc. >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Martin Stiemerling [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: 18 June, 2010 10:09 >To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); NSIS >Subject: RE: [NSIS] NSLP Registry Question > >Hi, > >We have basically the following situation: > >The QoS and NATFW NSLP share the error classes, but have >different error codes. The other parameters are fine. >(http://www.iana.org/assignments/nslp-parameters/nslp-parameter >s.xhtml#error-classes) > >I did do a instruction write-up for this and send it to IANA >but IANA requested better text - which I still need to provide. > >IANA wants specific and clear instructions what to do with error codes. > >Everything else is already fixed with IANA it is just to have >a proper write-up of the IANA instructions. > >I felt to clarify this. > > Martin > > >[email protected] > >NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe >Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, >London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >> Of Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) >> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 9:01 AM >> To: NSIS >> Subject: [NSIS] NSLP Registry Question >> >> Hi all, >> >> We got a question about the NATFW NSLP parameter registry from IANA, >> which I would like to bring forward to the group. >> >> What registries are actually shared between the different NSLPs. >> >> To know what I mean have a look at >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/nslp-parameters/nslp-parameters.xhtml >> >> Are the following registries shared between NSLPs or not? >> 1) NSLPs have messages >> 2) NSLPs have objects >> 3) NSLPs have error classes >> 4) NSLPs have error codes (which are sub-values of error classes) >> >> In the current version of the IANA registry the answer is >> (1) No, they are not shared. Two different registries are used. The >> NATFW uses the "NATFW NSLP Message Types" and the QoS NSLP uses "QoS >> NSLP Message Types". >> (2) Yes, they are shared, see NSLP Message Objects. >> (3) Yes, they are shared, see NSLP Error Classes. >> (4) That's where IANA came with a question to us because >they did not >> know what to do. >> >> Here is my suggestion: >> >> Ad 1) The messages have a very different semantic but putting them >> into the same registry probably does not hurt. >> Ad 2) I am fine with using the same registry. >> Ad 3) Using the same error class sounds also useful. >> Ad 4) I believe that the error codes are so different for each NSLP >> that they should go into a separate registry. >> >> This all assumes that only those values are used that are >defined for >> a specific NSLP and not randomly others from the same registry. >> >> Do others agree with me? I would like to close this issue! >> >> Ciao >> Hannes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nsis mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis >