Re: NSLP Registry Question

I did request this for the NATFW NSLP and did also for the QoS NSLP in the past, but just figured out that I forgot to remember IANA to do so. 

Let's wait for the answer from IANA (this is not sent via the NSIS ML) and request this afterwards.

Cheers,

  Martin

[email protected]

NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division
NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 9:48 AM
> To: Martin Stiemerling; NSIS
> Subject: RE: [NSIS] NSLP Registry Question
> 
> Thanks Martin for the super quick response.
> 
> In that case I would suggest to add the NSLP name to the different
> error
> code registries, such as s/"Informational Error Codes"/"QoS NSLP
> Informational Error Codes", etc.
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: ext Martin Stiemerling [mailto:[email protected]]
> >Sent: 18 June, 2010 10:09
> >To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); NSIS
> >Subject: RE: [NSIS] NSLP Registry Question
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >We have basically the following situation:
> >
> >The QoS and NATFW NSLP share the error classes, but have
> >different error codes. The other parameters are fine.
> >(http://www.iana.org/assignments/nslp-parameters/nslp-parameter
> >s.xhtml#error-classes)
> >
> >I did do a instruction write-up for this and send it to IANA
> >but IANA requested better text - which I still need to provide.
> >
> >IANA wants specific and clear instructions what to do with error
> codes.
> >
> >Everything else is already fixed with IANA it is just to have
> >a proper write-up of the IANA instructions.
> >
> >I felt to clarify this.
> >
> >  Martin
> >
> >
> >[email protected]
> >
> >NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe
> >Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road,
> >London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> >> Of Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> >> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 9:01 AM
> >> To: NSIS
> >> Subject: [NSIS] NSLP Registry Question
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> We got a question about the NATFW NSLP parameter registry from IANA,
> >> which I would like to bring forward to the group.
> >>
> >> What registries are actually shared between the different NSLPs.
> >>
> >> To know what I mean have a look at
> >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/nslp-parameters/nslp-
> parameters.xhtml
> >>
> >> Are the following registries shared between NSLPs or not?
> >> 1) NSLPs have messages
> >> 2) NSLPs have objects
> >> 3) NSLPs have error classes
> >> 4) NSLPs have error codes (which are sub-values of error classes)
> >>
> >> In the current version of the IANA registry the answer is
> >> (1) No, they are not shared. Two different registries are used. The
> >> NATFW uses the "NATFW NSLP Message Types" and the QoS NSLP uses "QoS
> >> NSLP Message Types".
> >> (2) Yes, they are shared, see NSLP Message Objects.
> >> (3) Yes, they are shared, see NSLP Error Classes.
> >> (4) That's where IANA came with a question to us because
> >they did not
> >> know what to do.
> >>
> >> Here is my suggestion:
> >>
> >> Ad 1) The messages have a very different semantic but putting them
> >> into the same registry probably does not hurt.
> >> Ad 2) I am fine with using the same registry.
> >> Ad 3) Using the same error class sounds also useful.
> >> Ad 4) I believe that the error codes are so different for each NSLP
> >> that they should go into a separate registry.
> >>
> >> This all assumes that only those values are used that are
> >defined for
> >> a specific NSLP and not randomly others from the same registry.
> >>
> >> Do others agree with me? I would like to close this issue!
> >>
> >> Ciao
> >> Hannes
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nsis mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
> >