[openpgp] Re: Encryption subkey selection
Andrew Gallagher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7 Apr 2025, at 11:13, Falko Strenzke <[email protected]> wrote: > In case of b) it doesn't seem to matter that much if we assign implicit rank 0 to keys or keep them outside the ESS selection algorithm altogether. I would tend to say in case the ESS selection fails, the sender should be be able to pick any set of encryption subkeys – whether they have an associated ESS or not. > In the case where a fallback cert exists, and no usable set of ranked subkeys can be found on the preferred cert, should a receiving implementation try the fallback cert's subkeys before or after reverting to “any reasonable method” on the preferred cert? A _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmf0BzQACgkQXB7EBNWQ ZimsqxAAmRIwtxxfzlhpfdYbelAhNWRRyszb5wT6D1NK2ZVm86B/Up0AJAh+g+Zz IAjzLC0N5aGyMI/3qNYVCqcf8gmfUoN925uxQ1dJ0cTCo9hd5+KvYAzRRf4roOnS jDKQX9LAPC9xMdkBkHFGTePp9F/XsQzlRua31G9pYreFyIE0Cci3BQdDz8riZHm8 nYacq0nvuJVZrWyXYr62rMmFd7rIDZYNppuc6qGriBfgfJd63t+4TDSgqWjIYyNl Jc4dB3rQ+n4dszHadBv+6+QZ0eSwU06KvnZSmg0J9Tb8scSQ7se9Q1iKV57ER7yd Bf6NFsZWyFlCPgAId8NcR2VzN0N1k364BsZrpprPRstNDApMo6Wt6E15hNaPhVzg 6u2Lr7i/01ev3cW3paRAHTUgG0mgB3Votr6H6RNFxuc2T+j9/9GFTDJmIV76YVdH 4uZeQm68tBSpGfgDQpix6TCMEP/D58t+4vRTIXvr8vVH8NS6nBmJIA6BGh8Y7fa7 Md+XBIhs/WX+B7V4rZNx3XN94R9XGz8EM4tNl4pEanCbnKiykN3dPiEcp2isvxK/ 8eGNmuflN4LQsJYoEZddfehrHmRdOEk8YnXofhK05KhsVuVjM6B+EaGsPs8lvCWb IE73JToYaBJbTPuypHGWwyRWDolg7y35DgbrZaXEPLbnXE/M0Vo= =Wc+g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----