[openpgp] Re: Encryption subkey selection
Falko Strenzke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Organization | MTG AG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think that is an absolutely logical progression. Still I am not sure how strongly the two mechanisms should be linked by their specifications. Even if this progression wasn't part of the normative spec, it could be mentioned as the recommended behaviour. But in any case, I am prepared to be convinced also of strongly linking the mechanisms if that should bring considerable advantage. Nevertheless, in the field there may always be implementations that support only one but not the other – or even neither –, so the certificate holder must be prepared that about anything can happen in terms of what set of encryption subkeys of his certificates will be used. Best regards, Falko Am 07.04.25 um 19:11 schrieb Andrew Gallagher: > On 7 Apr 2025, at 11:13, Falko Strenzke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> In case of b) it doesn't seem to matter that much if we assign >> implicit rank 0 to keys or keep them outside the ESS selection >> algorithm altogether. I would tend to say in case the ESS selection >> fails, the sender should be be able to pick any set of encryption >> subkeys – whether they have an associated ESS or not. >> > In the case where a fallback cert exists, and no usable set of ranked > subkeys can be found on the preferred cert, should a receiving > implementation try the fallback cert's subkeys before or after > reverting to “any reasonable method” on the preferred cert? > > A > > > _______________________________________________ > openpgp mailing list [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email [email protected] -- *MTG AG* Dr. Falko Strenzke Phone: +49 6151 8000 24 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: mtg.de <https://www.mtg.de> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MTG AG - Dolivostr. 11 - 64293 Darmstadt, Germany Commercial register: HRB 8901 Register Court: Amtsgericht Darmstadt Management Board: Jürgen Ruf (CEO), Tamer Kemeröz Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Dr. Thomas Milde This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the correct recipient or have received this email in error, please inform the sender immediately and delete this email.Unauthorised copying or distribution of this email is not permitted. Data protection information: Privacy policy <https://www.mtg.de/en/privacy-policy> _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 4.9 KB) - not displayed