[openpgp] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc [was: Re : I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc-08.txt]

On 6 May 2025, at 09:55, Daniel Huigens <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> All of that being said, there is kind of a third option which is: we leave draft-openpgp-pqc as-is, but we very quickly write up another draft for encryption subkey selection which makes the above statement in draft-openpgp-pqc true. I think that's a risky course of action if we don't manage to achieve consensus in the end, though, as we'll be left with an RFC for PQC in OpenPGP with a statement that's not true and a recommendation that doesn't work.

A fourth option is the same as the third, but we add a reference from the PQC draft to the subkey selection draft, and then they move forward in the IETF process as a group. This will stall the final publication of the PQC RFC until the encryption draft is ready, but it might serve to concentrate minds.

A

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/336
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----