[openpgp] Re: PQC: Proposed Standard or Informational?

Heiko Schäfer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.openpgp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The "Proposed Standard" designation sounds appropriate and desirable to me.
On 6/16/25 11:04 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hey folks--
>
> One final question as we move the OpenPGP PQC draft toward IETF last
> call.
>
> The draft is currently marked as "Informational", but i am leaning
> toward positioning it as a "Proposed Standard".
>
> I've opened this PR to ask for feedback from the editors:
>
>     https://github.com/openpgp-pqc/draft-openpgp-pqc/pull/219
>
> But if anyone else from the WG has thoughts about this, please feel free
> to weigh in.
>
> As i wrote on the PR:
>
>
> RFC 9580 (OpenPGP) is marked as a Proposed Standard, as was RFC
> 4880 (OpenPGP) and RFC 6637 (ECC in OpenPGP).
>
> By contrast, RFC 5581 (Camellia in OpenPGP) is marked informational.
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2026.html#section-4.1 says:
>
>     A Proposed Standard specification is generally stable, has resolved
>     known design choices, is believed to be well-understood, has received
>     significant community review, and appears to enjoy enough community
>     interest to be considered valuable.  However, further experience
>     might result in a change or even retraction of the specification
>     before it advances.
>
> whilehttps://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2026.html#section-4.2.2 says:
>
>     An "Informational" specification is published for the general
>     information of the Internet community, and does not represent an
>     Internet community consensus or recommendation.  The Informational
>     designation is intended to provide for the timely publication of a
>     very broad range of responsible informational documents from many
>     sources, subject only to editorial considerations and to verification
>     that there has been adequate coordination with the standards process
>     (see section 4.2.3).
>
> I recommend marking this as standards-track, and indicating that its
> aimed at "Proposed Standard".
>
>
> Regards,
>
>          --dkg
>
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.