[openpgp] Re: PQC: Proposed Standard or Informational?
Andrew Gallagher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17 Jun 2025, at 01:28, Heiko Schäfer <[email protected]> wrote: > > The "Proposed Standard" designation sounds appropriate and desirable to me. Agreed, especially when we consider that one of the secondary goals of this draft is that it should serve as a template for future PQC algorithms. It would seem strange for such a template to be merely Informational. A _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmhRLfYACgkQXB7EBNWQ ZinjpA//RBl9ffpgpkHSd5Y+0Ph/9Pgekov4WcaYdhz8f8KRFUyXs7nasZosW+Aq xc2+hcxl+TQMtutPVN8+guA8b4ssSDdSvwffVoSeRZXh69jHRy1lhosgtRPQW7Px uQYaIGaxjjNeNmkliwBX7SSOoBZ+9iTg7vnQFBE/kRXfKAL0XgeiSa65v7BhnZAz O3vY4sULGpHWI6XKH6emu2zleVxrPLQOKaXM4zYwKxq7liU5msFr6Wvf8HZ6kNZ2 eo37BacReJ/jwmkxkdtVawrSSlFblaKP7ozJCFjUyBgxj+DZxFRhL1vqDFxGEm0H Qg4CfQtN3VoknS1YcwnUVGRil4bzgyMWEcFqQKjMeCSrvgMaORmk7YJ+oBWvGDDO 5AMb7BR9oXyNSsbzmR/F8/Y1IeoQ2Cvjo5ngljQRKntYj6mVzG57p9uJekrfCFoC jhfkDLD9EE3ykHFDWdUIR46vSnUyiN9y2GQU8eaT6SDstci7uSJ3/q7d91Z9gTDW 7lZfr6izonArM8GEY80OgP13TOAoKp1l5lP2iOtg1T8vuS6+Q0jD0cCW8CLnBi08 XmSGBXVQrl0T0YpMVMRpnfZV+874hDgkSuV/17PiOC2jR5RuYx4gUzXKu3ZnuG3Q ELpOZAnHTuTRQX2b79ZaCiHzXXF7eTd86cebwE4QRSAOlnBHA9k= =l8iO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----