[openpgp] Re: OpenPGP WG next steps discussion
Andrew Gallagher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I almost forgot - I’m also in favour of adopting an “encryption subkey selection” draft, which is required to cover some loose ends left over from the key replacement draft, but is also useful in its own right - particularly since implementation behaviour has historically been inconsistent. I don’t feel I can contribute much to such a draft, but I think it is important work nonetheless. (This is therefore a classic example of the proverbial Someone™) A _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmjJMtUACgkQXB7EBNWQ ZilncQ/+KMiwrlLHlU0ihuDhseEk+AKVQ5ap36fZNYQlAckdMq4e5w0Yby+umqL1 O/RQ2kn6MZ7xHhcKXns7EM1iiKXAh5J523GCv2ZIf57PWRxnn9G4hC/KyKFaTDav cGebUEUR5AVupmaeCXAyYD5iOUmXSiYTokTgfzoTkaCUAuHoitORSnGLwJ+Ofn6Q p2PvCKAwQlfhgv2n2Myke/71xDfHWB4uijIkOxyLL6UWGPQ/YYFqb70n2bdTq7vr jH9BriYZXoXPbVhpYpaNqIZZursa29SDFh3EJG1LtWG3DPP7BYXwPOKPoTft5BQM McjNIzQbV1huXhHItpZUM4tNxXG0wtONvOuvEDxrCjW/nILeZXhRUtq8vQvhbrRQ enVmRfLen/a8FMH73jl0egvVhZ5nBBuUEon10dtpcJGVrgwAwX+qtq+eXz4oUTfA qSgsw8Fv5O47LKVARQS7Z5RenETwiCUucan56LKItxmGxY4v23xYGmenFPJIs9ss NJKUQxt32IdYdQwxLC4VwcLWfwsMHt1omCN5LZ2DNt+LNeFE2a+rwOoWSEUy0but 5mxrNAbQbO1VdZ5hQYqLFkf4U9/4hB5QUv7Pbau84bHkVUCzSzOzU1yLBCl7G0RB ian/qgt61qVoI3TsNXGn/+P7NU6pZAlC4ROI1pfGvivHIPI/WPc= =mMUd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----