Re: Revised ID needed for draft-ietf-opes-end-comm-06.txt
Alex Rousskov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.opes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Markus Hofmann wrote: > - Section 8.2 discusses a threat introduced by using OPES for > wiretap, but according to RFC 2804, the "IETF has decided not to > consider requirements for wiretapping as part of the process for > creating and maintaining IETF standards." > > Seems like removing this specific threat scenario from Section 8.2 > will address this specific comment. FWIW, I believe this comment should be addressed differently, by adding the following text (or its polished version): Following an IETF policy on Wiretapping [RFC2804], OPES communication model does not consider wiretapping requirements. Nevertheless, the documented threat is real, not obvious, and OPES technology users operating in wiretapping or similar logging environments should be aware of it. Thank you, Alex.