Re: Revised ID needed for draft-ietf-opes-end-comm-06.txt

Alex Rousskov wrote:

> FWIW, I believe this comment should be addressed differently, by
> adding the following text (or its polished version):
> 
>   Following an IETF policy on Wiretapping [RFC2804], OPES
>   communication model does not consider wiretapping requirements.
>   Nevertheless, the documented threat is real, not obvious, and
>   OPES technology users operating in wiretapping or similar
>   logging environments should be aware of it.

I wouldn't have a problem with phrasing it that way. I actually like 
the idea of keeping it documented somewhere.

-Markus