Re: Which SMTP element?
Markus Hofmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.opes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alex Rousskov wrote: > Given the above, I think MTA is an appropriate first target. Since we > are OPES, we should be looking for an intermediary here. Targeting > MUAs would be like targeting browsers in OCP/HTTP profile, right? The > latter is not theoretically inappropriate (nobody can clearly define > what an intermediary or "edge" is), but also not important enough for > OPES right now. I'm *no* expert on SMTP or email in general, but I would tend to agree. > Moreover, could we try to simplify the charter by removing all other > SMTP agents from it? Can we just hope that OCP/SMTP profile with a > focus on MTAs will be applicable enough to MSAs and MDAs? We can > always add MSA- or MDA-specific features later, right? Sounds ok to me. Anyone any strong feelings? -Markus