Re: P-services interface in Strawman OPES Charter
Markus Hofmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.opes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alex Rousskov wrote: > I am worried that if we want to define WSDL profile for OCP, some of > us (or some of IESG) will find that extending W3C technology like WSDL > is out of current charter scope. We do not know whether using WSDL is > the right way to go, but should we just mention that we need to > > Define P-services interface, based on existing interface > description standards like WSDL, if possible, or OPES-specific > description otherwise. What about the following: In addition, the WG will define a rules language to control selection and invocation of services by an OPES processor. This includes a mechanism allowing an OPES processor to perform a runtime check of service parameters, leveraging existing interface description standards like WSDL, if possible, or OPES-specific description otherwise. -Markus