Re: P-services interface in Strawman OPES Charter

Markus Hofmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Alex Rousskov wrote:

> I am worried that if we want to define WSDL profile for OCP, some of
> us (or some of IESG) will find that extending W3C technology like WSDL
> is out of current charter scope. We do not know whether using WSDL is
> the right way to go, but should we just mention that we need to
> 
> 	Define P-services interface, based on existing interface
> 	description standards like WSDL, if possible, or OPES-specific
> 	description otherwise.

What about the following:

   In addition, the WG will define a rules language to control
   selection and invocation of services by an OPES processor. This
   includes a mechanism allowing an OPES processor to perform a runtime
   check of service parameters, leveraging existing interface
   description standards like WSDL, if possible, or OPES-specific
   description otherwise.

-Markus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.