Re: TMOC Liaison - Security Management System (TMOC Issue 56)
RJ Atkinson <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:17:42 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops-nm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 3, 2005, at 16:59, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote: > I am already sending a response that their references to the SNMP RFCs > are VEYR VERY outdated. I have not look at this in detail. Not just those references. They have some seriously out of date references scattered all over the place. Here are some other examples of outdated references found in < 2 minutes of glance: RFC-793 is not the latest word on TCP. A number of other RFCs are now required of all modern implementations, but are not listed. The POSIX documents are both drafts from IEEE 1003, not from USG. TCSEC has been replaced twice already (first by ITSEC, more recently by the ISO Common Criteria + various security profile documents). For Kerberos, they cite an ancient MIT document, rather than the reasonably current IETF standards-track RFCs. For SSH, they cite known-insecure old versions rather than the work from the IETF SECSH WG. There is a lot of opportunity for them to revisit and correct their list of references. Yours, Ran [email protected] Disclaimer: Employed by, but not speaking for, Extreme Networks.