Re: draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04 - is there consensus?
Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:45:37PM -0800, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We've WGLC'd this document twice, and each time we've gotten submissions and suggestions. The authors have updated the text based on the last WGLC responses. As most of the response has been fairly positive, we would like to move this version of the document to the IESG for approval. If anyone has serious objections - please raise them on the list within 72 hours from now (say midnight Friday, 10 Feb, UTC). Silence is acceptance :)
>
I looked through the diffs and they seem to be fine. Before this
document goes to the IESG, we should perhaps clear the open issues
listed in Appendix C:
o What is the status of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview? It expired
on November 2011.
o Decide what to do with following references:
o What is the status of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-08?
(RFC Ed Queue for 569 days, depends on
draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-13.txt awaiting author action)
o What is the status of draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10?
(RFC Ed Queue for 198 days, depends on draft-ietf-ipfix-psamp-mib
awaiting AD-Go-Ahead::External Party)
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>