Re: draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04 - is there consensus?
"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64035E00DF@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> |
Hi Juergen, thank you for the positive feedback. Concerning draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream and draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model, I asked already our AD with an email after the submission of our draft. They seem to be underway and will be available at the latest during the publication of draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds as Informational RFC. RFC Editor can then replace the I-D reference with the corresponding RFC reference. Concerning draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview I had to delete the corresponding text, as it expired already in November 2011 and I did not get any answer to my earlier mail to the authors. I assume it is not going to be finalized soon. May be OPSAWG chairs know more than I do and can say a few clarifying words. Cheers, Mehmet > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > ext Juergen Schoenwaelder > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:40 PM > To: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OPS-AREA] draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04 - is there > consensus? > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:45:37PM -0800, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > We've WGLC'd this document twice, and each time we've gotten submissions > and suggestions. The authors have updated the text based on the last WGLC > responses. As most of the response has been fairly positive, we would like to move > this version of the document to the IESG for approval. If anyone has serious > objections - please raise them on the list within 72 hours from now (say midnight > Friday, 10 Feb, UTC). Silence is acceptance :) > > > > I looked through the diffs and they seem to be fine. Before this > document goes to the IESG, we should perhaps clear the open issues > listed in Appendix C: > > o What is the status of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview? It expired > on November 2011. > > o Decide what to do with following references: > > o What is the status of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-08? > (RFC Ed Queue for 569 days, depends on > draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-13.txt awaiting author action) > > o What is the status of draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10? > (RFC Ed Queue for 198 days, depends on draft-ietf-ipfix-psamp-mib > awaiting AD-Go-Ahead::External Party) > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > _______________________________________________ > OPS-AREA mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area