Re: draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04 - is there consensus?

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ops
Message-ID <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64035E00DF@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
Hi Juergen,

thank you for the positive feedback.

Concerning draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream and
draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model, I asked already our AD
with an email after the submission of our draft. They seem 
to be underway and will be available at the latest during the 
publication of draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds as 
Informational RFC. RFC Editor can then replace the I-D 
reference with the corresponding RFC reference.

Concerning draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview I had to delete the 
corresponding text, as it expired already in November 2011 and
I did not get any answer to my earlier mail to the authors.
I assume it is not going to be finalized soon. 

May be OPSAWG chairs know more than I do and can say a few 
clarifying words. 

Cheers, 
Mehmet 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of
> ext Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:40 PM
> To: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OPS-AREA] draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04 - is
there
> consensus?
> 
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:45:37PM -0800, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > 	We've WGLC'd this document twice, and each time we've gotten
submissions
> and suggestions.  The authors have updated the text based on the last
WGLC
> responses.  As most of the response has been fairly positive, we would
like to move
> this version of the document to the IESG for approval.  If anyone has
serious
> objections - please raise them on the list within 72 hours from now
(say midnight
> Friday, 10 Feb, UTC).  Silence is acceptance :)
> >
> 
> I looked through the diffs and they seem to be fine. Before this
> document goes to the IESG, we should perhaps clear the open issues
> listed in Appendix C:
> 
>    o  What is the status of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview?  It
expired
>       on November 2011.
> 
>    o  Decide what to do with following references:
> 
>    o  What is the status of
draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-08?
>       (RFC Ed Queue for 569 days, depends on
>       draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-13.txt awaiting author action)
> 
>    o  What is the status of draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10?
>       (RFC Ed Queue for 198 days, depends on
draft-ietf-ipfix-psamp-mib
>       awaiting AD-Go-Ahead::External Party)
> 
> /js
> 
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> _______________________________________________
> OPS-AREA mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.