Re: configuration: writable MIB modules versus NETCONF/YANG modules

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 06:40:41PM -0500, ietfdbh wrote:

> I don't think remaining silent is a feature, when WGs have asked for
> guidance.

I do not think David's protocol selection problem warrants an IESG
statement. Protocol selection is a question that many WGs face. It
continue to believe that it is a feature that the proposed IESG
statement stays focused.

If people believe there could be an IESG statement concerning
notifications, go ahead and draft text, start a discussion thread and
build consensus around it.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>